Pushing Forward on vacation

We're taking a week off from the Pushing Forward podcast. We'll be back with all new episodes in 2010. Happy New Year!

Pushing Forward Podcast Episode 7

Below please find the seventh episode of the "Pushing Forward" podcast.

In Episode 7 Marc Ratner, Zuffa's VP of Government and Regulatory Affairs, joins me to discuss mixed martial arts in Maine.

CONDOR Comments

The Massachusetts Air National Guard (ANG) wants to lower its training altitude from 7,000 to 500 feet over an area stretching from Coos County, New Hampshire, across Oxford, Franklin and into Somerset County here in Maine.

On Saturday, November 14th, 2009, a hearing was held at the University of Maine at Farmington to allow the public to state their views on the proposed change to Condor flight space. I testified at the hearing and what follows is a copy of the written remarks I followed-up with to be part of the official administrative record.



As the member of the Maine House of Representative for District 92, I represent the area that is at the heart of the section of Western Maine that will be most strongly impacted by the changes proposed by the Massachusetts Air National Guard (ANG) with respect to lower level flights as an element in CONDOR Military Operations Area (MOA).

I attended the public hearing in Farmington and offered oral testimony at that time, and have subsequently reviewed more information, spoken with many constituents, as well as a variety of people with significant experience in environmental impact assessments, military preparedness policy, and mediating broader public policy discussions. Since this is an important issue for my constituents, I have tried to take a considered approach in my review of the situation and my recommendations for a way forward.

Let me summarize my assessment of the situation and a potential remedy. The present plan proposed by the ANG is incomplete and as a result may be ill-conceived. The outcome appears to have been pre-determined and the Environmental Impact Study that was conducted was developed as an “after the fact” solution to placate citizen concerns that had not been anticipated by military planners when making the initial proposal. The only acceptable remedy to this situation is to back up and start the process over in a way that will be transparent and coherent, representing the valid concerns of all parties impacted by the decision including members of the military as well as civilians living in the impacted areas.

It seems to me that there are two primary interests that must be balanced in this decision making process -- first, the legitimate needs to provide adequate training for military pilots that may be called upon to use skills in a time of conflict, with such skill that can only be gained through thorough training. Second, the rights of citizens and businesses in Western Maine to enjoy the quality of life they expect without the disruption, intrusion, noise, and other potential impacts of these low level, high speed flights.

Frankly, I do not believe we have yet obtained the objective evaluation of these two interests that would allow us to make a balanced and considered policy judgment. Therefore, I respectfully request and will do all in my power to see that this decision is put on hold until these two elements can be thoroughly analyzed by professional and independent individuals or organizations, and those conclusions can be brought together as a part of a publically accessible process to weigh benefits against costs. If we undertake such a process, we will arrive at a conclusion that can be widely supported. Otherwise, the current division and opposition to these low level flights will only intensify with an increasing likelihood of further contentious and time consuming debates in the future.

In short, this should be a classic cost benefit analysis that examines the value of the flights as a training tool, measures that value against a realistic assessment of the environmental impacts, and looks at a range of alternatives for mediating the impacts including -- limits of scheduled exercises; expansion of training areas to include other similar regions, such as the Western Massachusetts mountains, in order to more equitably distribute the potential negative impacts to a wider area by reducing the frequency of the disruption for everyone while still accomplishing the military intent and mission, or; other measures that will meet the military objectives without an outsize impact on the general population.

One discussion with a constituent has stuck in my mind, and I want to close my request for revisiting this process by sharing it. This conversation was with a professional who retired after many years in the environmental remediation business, and he told me about a project he had worked on for the Massachusetts Air National Guard in the remediation and clean-up of jet-fuel contaminated soils at a Massachusetts airbase.

Apparently, for an extended period the standard operating procedure at a Massachusetts Air National Guard facility was to run a fire hose into the jet fuel storage tanks and let loose with the water forcing the unused jet fuel and water out of the tanks and directly onto the ground. As a result, within a few years when environmental testing was performed, there was a growing potential of a hydrocarbon contamination plume that would have reached a larger aquifer and contaminated wells for a significant area. The only solution was a costly clean-up by digging up and disposing of hundreds of thousands of tons of contaminated soils that had to be placed in landfills or otherwise recycled off site. The cost of the clean-up was hundreds of thousands of dollars and perhaps more -- all because of poor planning and a failure to measure the unintended consequences of actions taken within a military command structure not accustomed to transparency and outside scrutiny.

I hope we will not repeat that type of short-sightedness here, but it seems we are on this path unless the decision is reconsidered in a wider and more objective framework. If this project is worth doing, it is worth doing right, because we are talking about the expenditure of significant taxpayer dollars. I urge you to redesign your decision-making process, gather the needed facts and have those facts analyzed by independent and objective sources, and then move that analysis into the public arena where it can be absorbed and discussed by the citizens it will impact. This will produce a better outcome than our current trajectory.

At the end of the process, what we all want is a good decision -- carefully made and based on facts. The vast majority of my constituents want a decision based on reality -- they are not ready to trust whatever the Massachusetts Air National Guard leadership says about the value of the training exercises unconditionally, nor are they ready to adopt unquestioningly the statements made by environmental, community, and business leaders concerned about potential impacts.

I urge you to step back, take the time, and develop a fact-based approach that can lead to an appropriate decision which can be widely supported. I am ready to assist in that process in whatever way possible. Thank you for your consideration.

Pushing Forward Podcast Episode 6

Below please find the sixth episode of the "Pushing Forward" podcast.

In Episode 6 the Rumford Fire Chief, Bob Chase, joins me to discuss how the budget and tax revenues impacts local services like fire protection.

A Matter of Balance

It’s recently become popular among pundits and others to quote the 19th Century German leader, Otto Von Bismarck by repeating that “Politics is the art of the possible.” My experience serving the River Valley over the last year has been a little different -- I have been learning the art of balance. Bringing new ideas to help balance the state’s budget has become the biggest part of my job. Trying to see an issue from all sides and respecting the variety of competing ideas has become much more natural for me in working through the difficulties facing our state.

Last week, Governor Baldacci unveiled his proposed curtailment package to reduce budget expenditures in the current fiscal year in light of lowered revenue projections. At the time, he indicated that this is the first phase of an estimated $400 million in budget reductions in the current two-year budget. As expected, these initial curtailments fell most heavily on human services programs and state aid to education. Every indication is that the rest of this $400 million shortfall will also hit education and human services programs hardest. That means our children and the most vulnerable in our population -- seniors, low income families, and people with chronic health problems -- will bear the heaviest burdens.

Colleagues with many years of service in the legislature have indicated that it is much more rewarding to serve in times when the economy is strong and the budget is more easily balanced. I am sure that is true -- but we are now in a very different time, and I am committed to working as creatively as possible to find ways to minimize the impacts of these cuts on essential services to our most vulnerable neighbors. I have already reached out to many of the service providers in our area to encourage them to work with me to find the best alternatives in this bad situation. That is part of what we must balance -- the need for these life-sustaining services even at a time when so many of our neighbors are struggling with this economic downturn.

Other issues must also be faced with a sense of balance. Last week, I joined the House Majority Leader, John Piotti and the House Chair of the Natural Resources Committee, Robert Duchesne in hosting a group of people, including some well-known citizens and property owners in our area, who are concerned about the health impacts from wind turbines. We had a positive discussion and have encouraged these folks to focus on practical suggestions that really address their core concerns of identifying and minimizing any health impacts from wind energy facilities.

One thing seems pretty certain -- wind facilities will play a role in our green energy future. A recent scientifically conducted survey by the Portland based research firm, Critical Insights, found that nine out of ten Maine residents support the development of wind power in our state, while two-thirds of those surveyed “strongly support” the concept. One thing seems certain -- wind energy is here and more will be developed in Maine. At the same time, we must find the balance to insure that this development takes into account the potential of health impacts and finds practical ways to mitigate them. We find that balance by working together.

Sticking with wind power for a bit longer -- earlier in the month I had the opportunity to travel to the University of Maine at Orono to visit with Dr. Habib Dagher who is the Director of the Advanced Structures and Composites Laboratory. I set up the meeting with Dr. Dagher to get a detailed update on the work at the University while looking for a connection between this cutting edge work and the natural resources and expertise here in the River Valley. One of their many projects is work on composite manufacturing of the blades for commercial wind turbines. In addition, the lab has just received a multi-million dollar grant from the U.S. Department of Energy to take the lead in developing a model off-shore wind energy project in Maine.

While Dr. Dagher did not have a project he could drop into the Tech Center in Rumford, he did offer encouragement for a more diversified industrial future for Maine, drawing on our traditional wood resources, as well as our strong tradition of manufacturing in this area. New ideas are constantly being developed, tested and commercialized, and the River Valley must maintain its aggressive posture of looking for new opportunities to bring quality jobs to our area. We need to find a new sense of balance for our economy by growing quality jobs that will use the skills our workforce has -- or can obtain.

The next few months will be a challenge, and I look forward to the ongoing dialogue with the citizens in the River Valley to help me represent you in these difficult choices. I count on all of you to help me maintain a strong sense of balance as we struggle with these issues of restructuring programs and reducing expenditures while maintaining vital services and growing our economy. Thank you for entrusting me with this important task.

Matt Peterson
State Representative – District 92

Bracing for the Budget Crisis

Last week, Governor Baldacci unveiled his proposed curtailment package to reduce budget expenditures in the current fiscal year in light of lowered revenue projections. At the time, he indicated that this is the first phase of an estimated $400 million in budget reductions in the current fiscal year. As expected, these initial curtailments fell most heavily on human services programs and state aid to education.

This morning, DHHS Commissioner Brenda Harvey, while addressing a work group on long term care, provided the first insights into the likely shape of these future cuts. While present curtailments have targeted state funding and excluded Medicaid funded programs that are matched by the federal government, the next round of cuts for the Department will apparently include deep cuts in current Medicaid funded programs. Commissioner Harvey indicated that cuts to state funded programs will be much deeper, but that she expects that the cuts to Medicaid programs will be $100 million meaning a reduction of these services by approximately $400 million when the federal match of approximately $3 federal to every $1 of state money is considered.

Obviously, removing $400 million dollars from current Medicaid services will have a devastating impact on many citizens and families -- including those who receive the services as well as those employed to deliver these services. I am committed to working with the agencies and providers of the River Valley to fully understand the impact that such cuts may have on the quality of services, the quality of life, and essential employment in our communities. As specific proposals are unveiled in the Governor’s supplemental budget, probably at some time soon after the first of the year, I want to hear from you about the impacts of any proposed cuts and work with you to identify alternatives that may blunt the worst impacts of any proposed cuts.

Colleagues with many years of service in the legislature have indicated that it is much more rewarding to serve in times when the economy is strong and the budget is more easily balanced. I am sure that is true -- but we are now in a very different time, and I am committed to working with you as creatively as possible to find ways to minimize the impacts of these cuts on essential services to our most vulnerable neighbors. Let’s keep in close touch as this situation unfolds. Good information and communication will help me do the best I possibly can on behalf of you and our fellow citizens in the River Valley.

Matt

Pushing Forward Podcast Episode 5

Below please find the fifth episode of the "Pushing Forward" podcast.

In Episode 5 I am joined by Jay Hardy, a consultant with over 30 years experience in state government, to discuss Maine's long-term care system.

To learn more about current efforts underway to improve Maine's long-term supportive services system, visit:


http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/reports/ltc-services-adults.shtml

Pushing Forward Podcast Episode 4

Below please find the fourth episode of the "Pushing Forward" podcast.

In Episode 4 we sit down with Representative Ed Mazurek, House Chair of the Transportation Committee, to discuss the recent transportation bond passed by voters on November 3rd, 2009.

Pushing Forward Podcast Episode 3

Below please find the third episode of the "Pushing Forward" podcast.

In Episode 3 we sit down with House Majority Leader, Representative John Piotti, to discuss tax reform.

Juice Conference Remarks

Midcoast Magnet is a networking organization that seeks to attract, connect and retain talented people in Maine and the midcoast. In November, Midcoast Magnet presented the Juice 2.0 conference, "Building Maine's Innovation Networks." The conference was organized through collaborative efforts and funding from organizations as diverse as the Maine Arts Commission, the Department of Economic and Community Development, and the Realize! Maine program of the Maine Development Foundation. To learn more about Midcoast Magnet visit:


www.midcoastmagnet.com

On November 14th, 2009, I was invited to the Juice 2.0 conference to speak as part of the "Get Involved, Get Elected" panel with Speaker of the Maine House, Hannah Pingree, and State Senator Seth Goodall. Below are my remarks from the event:

JUICE CONFERENCE TALK

I’m honored to be on this platform with such an exciting group of people, including one of the folks that really inspired me to run for office -- Speaker of the House Hannah Pingree.

It’s easy for folks to be cynical about politics, politicians and the political process. That cynicism is nothing new and it is not relegated to one political party or one end of the political spectrum -- right or left. If you look at the political blogs - national and state, left and right -- what they all seem to have in common is cynicism. Just to prove that the cynicism is nothing new -- here’s one of my favorite quotes from Harry Truman -- delivered in an interview on his front porch in Independence Missouri after he retired from the White House: "My choice early in life was either to be a piano player in a whorehouse or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference. I, for one, believe the piano player job to be much more honorable than current politicians.”

I never learned to play the piano, so my career choices were even more limited than President Truman. I did however, have the chance to work as an advocate in the Maine State Legislature for several years on behalf of people with a disability as well as for direct care workers who provide home and community based services to seniors and people with a disability. I was passionate about that -- because it was all about my life and my experience. When I first went to Augusta, I expected to find out that Harry Truman was right -- but I had just the opposite experience.

What I found in Augusta was not what people like to characterize as the “no good politicians,” nor did I find the legislative process like the proverbial “sausage making.” Instead, what I found were people who were committed to serving their fellow citizens and brought their experience, their interest and their passions to that discussion. I found people hungry for the best ideas, the best ways to serve others, the best ways to invest our limited and hard-earned tax dollars to produce the most possible benefit.

I was ready to be skeptical, and I came away a true believer -- filled with admiration and respect for people like Hannah -- who were giving up big chunks of their life and times, putting other career and personal choices on the back burner to serve their fellow Maine citizens. I saw people like Hannah working hard -- and I knew she was smart enough and talented enough to write her own ticket and do just about anything she wanted to do -- but she wanted to serve in a citizen legislature -- far from a full time job, but enough work to keep you from pursuing any other career very successfully.

I got inspired by those citizen legislators, and especially the younger members who were trying to make a difference. The Maine Legislature is diverse -- people of all ages and backgrounds -- and that is what makes it work.

I was there to advocate on some specific issues, but I couldn’t get enough. I sat in Committee meetings and the Appropriations Committee for hour after hour -- and I couldn’t get enough. I expected I would glaze over, but my experience was just the opposite. I was fascinated to talk with lobbyists and people who had been around the state house for years. I was interested in the personalities and the institution and the interactions of the two that resulted in compromises -- and good legislation. I was hooked. I was interested in just about everything that went on under the golden dome.

I got to be good friends with the Legislator who was serving my hometown of Rumford, and when he was term-limited and could not run for re-election, he asked if I would be interested in running for the seat. It was a tough decision -- took me about one day to make up my mind. I knew it would be hard. To get elected in Maine -- the politics is all retail and that means knocking on every door of the district -- meeting as many voters as possible, listening, and getting out the message. Knocking on doors in Rumford Maine is pretty tough when you are in a wheelchair -- it added to the challenge. But it gave me a great opportunity to organize friends and supporters to help me in that task. I built a network -- and that network got me elected -- I couldn’t have done it any other way. I like Bean Suppers -- but how many can you attend?

Since I’ve come to the Legislature, I’ve continued to work on building that network. Not because I want to use those relationships to move ahead -- but because those relationships are how I learn -- about issues, about what Maine people need and want, and about how to use government effectively to solve problems. It’s all about relationships.

Being in the Legislature, I’ve had a chance to work on many key issues -- long term care and home based services for seniors and people with a disability has been a passion -- but that’s something I really know about -- you can say “I’m experienced” and I want to share those experiences with my peers so we can make improvements for all Maine citizens. I am also a big fan of Mixed Martial Arts, so I’ve been able to work with others to create a framework that will regulate that sport and bring it to Maine. This session, I’ll be working on issues of internet availability and pricing, as well as joining colleagues in the search for ways to make our budget more sustainable while ensuring that we don’t damage the vital safety net. I’ve found myself increasingly in the middle of the discussion of wind energy -- since there is one project approved for my district and another on the drawing board. I guarantee you -- people have opinions about those projects -- and it’s not just one opinion.

I could keep on going -- but I’ll stop there. Let me just say -- If you have passion for working with others, if you have a passion for serving other people, if you like long hours and low pay -- and if you think you’d enjoy getting nasty voice messages and e-mails for your hard work -- running for the Legislature is for you. It has been one of the greatest experiences of my life -- almost as exciting and interesting as breaking your neck, but way more fun. If a guy like me, who is trying to start a career, wanting to get married, buy a house, start a family, and do all those “normal” things can run for office and be elected in Rumford Maine -- nothing should be holding any of you back. With great role models like Madame Speaker -- what are you waiting for?

Remarks from Maine Youth Anti-Tobacco Summit

The Maine Youth Action Network (MYAN) is a statewide Network of support for youth and adults who are striving to effect positive change on a wide variety of issues. MYAN is a partnership of youth and adult staff working with youth groups, adults who support those groups and organizations interested in involving youth to assist them all in making a difference through youth and adult partnership. To learn more about MYAN visit:

www.myan.org.

On November 11th, 2009, I was invited by MYAN to be a panelist at their 6th Annual Maine Youth Anti-Tobacco Summit. Below are my remarks from the event.


MYAN CONFERENCE TALK

I’m honored to be invited to speak to such an exciting group of people, interested in advocating and promoting change. I’m a Legislator now -- and I interact with lots of advocates. I used to be an advocate before I got elected -- and I started pretty young, although not as young as you, and learned as I went. I want to share a few ideas and lessons I’ve learned with you. I hope it helps.

First, it’s easy for folks to be cynical about politics, politicians and the political process. That cynicism is nothing new and it is not relegated to one political party or one end of the political spectrum -- right or left. If you look at the political blogs - national and state, left and right -- what they all seem to have in common is cynicism. Just to prove that the cynicism is nothing new -- here’s one of my favorite quotes from Harry Truman -- delivered in an interview on his front porch in Independence Missouri after he retired from the White House: "My choice early in life was either to be a piano player in a whorehouse or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference. I, for one, believe the piano player job to be much more honorable than current politicians.”

I never learned to play the piano, so my career choices were even more limited than President Truman. I did however, have the chance to work as an advocate in the Maine State Legislature for several years on behalf of people with a disability as well as for direct care workers who provide home and community based services to seniors and people with a disability. I was passionate about that -- because it was all about my life and my experience. When I first went to Augusta, I expected to find out that Harry Truman was right -- but I had just the opposite experience.

What I found in Augusta was not what people like to characterize as the “no good politicians,” nor did I find the legislative process like the proverbial “sausage making.” Instead, what I found were people who were committed to serving their fellow citizens and brought their experience, their interest and their passions to that discussion. I found people hungry for the best ideas, the best ways to serve others, the best ways to invest our limited and hard-earned tax dollars to produce the most possible benefit.

I was ready to be skeptical, and I came away a true believer -- filled with admiration and respect for people who were giving up big chunks of their life and times, putting other career and personal choices on the back burner to serve their fellow Maine citizens. I saw people smart enough and talented enough to write their own ticket and do just about anything -- but they wanted to serve in a citizen legislature -- far from a full time job, but enough work to keep you from pursuing any other career very successfully.

I got inspired by those citizen legislators, and especially the younger members who were trying to make a difference. So that is Lesson Number One if you want to be a good advocate -- GET INSPIRED, BELIEVE, HAVE PASSION, FORGET CYNICISM.

Lesson Number Two -- KNOW YOUR FACTS, DEVELOP YOUR MESSAGE. As a Legislator I don’t have lots of time. I want to listen, but I want you to inform me. Don’t waste your time, or anyone else’s. If you believe in what you are doing -- speak your truth with conviction. I won’t bite and neither will anyone else in the Legislature. You are all voters -- or you will be -- and you certainly know and influence people who are voters -- parents, grandparents, teachers, etc. We want to learn from you -- but you have to be ready to teach us. Do your homework.

Speaking of doing your homework, Lesson Number Three -- LEARN ABOUT THE PROCESS AND THE INSTITUTION. Even though I was there to advocate on some specific issues, I couldn’t get enough. I sat in Committee meetings and the Appropriations Committee for hour after hour -- and I couldn’t get enough. I expected I would glaze over, but my experience was just the opposite. I was fascinated to talk with lobbyists and people who had been around the state house for years. I was interested in the personalities and the institution and the interactions of the two that resulted in compromises -- and good legislation. I was hooked. I was interested in just about everything that went on under the golden dome.

As a result, I got to be good friends with the Legislator who was serving my hometown of Rumford, and when he was term-limited and could not run for re-election, he asked if I would be interested in running for the seat. It was a tough decision -- took me about one day to make up my mind. I knew it would be hard. To get elected in Maine -- the politics is all retail and that means knocking on every door of the district -- meeting as many voters as possible, listening, and getting out the message. Knocking on doors in Rumford Maine is pretty tough when you are in a wheelchair -- it added to the challenge. But it gave me a great opportunity to organize friends and supporters to help me in that task. I built a network -- and that network got me elected -- I couldn’t have done it any other way.

Since I’ve come to the Legislature, I’ve continued to work on building that network. Not because I want to use those relationships to move ahead -- but because those relationships are how I learn -- about issues, about what Maine people need and want, and about how to use government effectively to solve problems. It’s all about relationships. So that’s the Final Lesson -- THE ADVOCACY NEVER STOPS.

I could keep on going -- but I’ll stop there. Let me just say -- If you have passion for working with others, if you have a passion for serving other people, advocacy is for you. What are you waiting for?

Pushing Forward Podcast Episode 2

Below please find the second episode of the "Pushing Forward" podcast.

In Episode 2 we examine Maine's budget writing process. Joining us to discuss this complex process is the House Chair of the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee, Representative Emily Cain.

Pushing Forward Podcast Episode 1

Below please find the first episode of the "Pushing Forward" podcast.

In Episode 1 we examine Question 4 on the November 3rd, 2009 ballot. Question 4 is more commonly referred to as TABOR II. The question, a Citizen Initiative, asks: “Do you want to change the existing formulas that limit state and local government spending and require voter approval by referendum for spending over those limits and for increases in state taxes?”

In order to explore the issue, I speak with Nancy Kelleher, head of AARP in Maine.

Update From Augusta 10.18.09

Even after the Legislative session ends, the work continues -- and this year, activity has been particularly intense. Maine’s legislative calendar was initially structured to respect the time commitments of citizen legislators with the first session of a two year Legislative term to be the longer and more intense period -- with the introduction of regular bills, the passage of a two year budget, and the conduct of the state’s business. The second session was designed to be shorter -- to deal with any held over bills, manage emergencies, and make any adjustments in the budget as necessary.

Given the continuing turmoil in the national and state economy, our second session will be as demanding as the first one, as we confront a looming budget deficit. When we completed the budget last session, we intentionally left a $30 million dollar “hole” that would have to be addressed -- either by improvements in the economy that would increase revenue collections, other enhancements to the state’s revenues, or by making further cuts. Unfortunately, the revenue collections have continued to lag far behind projections, so in January we will face the difficult decisions about filling what is now estimated to be a $200 million budget shortfall that will have to be made up in a little over 1 fiscal year.

The Commissioner of Health and Human Services, meeting with our Legislative Committee this week, indicated she is looking for $80 million of new cuts -- something that is likely the leave big gaps in the safety net for Maine’s most vulnerable citizens. Another $60 to $70 million has been proposed to be cut from education funding which will mean less state aid to education. As a result, either educational services will have to be cut or local school support will have to be raised -- or both. Given the sharp increase in property taxes in Rumford and other communities in the district this year, another jump in the local share for education will be difficult for many families to manage.

I will continue to work on these issues with my colleagues to find creative solutions that will minimize the impacts of program cuts while looking out for taxpayer concerns. In this situation, there are not any good choices -- we will have to be picking between bad choices and trying to do the least amount of harm until we start to feel the effects of economic recovery. We all have to pull together to work through this difficult period in our state’s economic history, and I encourage you to contact me with ideas or approaches that might be able to help in determining the best possible course.

In addition to the ongoing budget discussions, I have been involved in significant follow-up to legislation I introduced in the last session and which was subsequently passed. LD 1078, a bill to make changes in our long term care system in order to better serve the needs of Maine seniors and people with a disability, has generated a great deal of work on a system redesign. I have been part of a twenty person group that began meeting at the end of the summer and has been meeting frequently in order to promote this systems change. Consumers, workers, advocates, state officials and providers have all come together to analyze the existing system. We are now nearing the end of this intensive process as we develop new approaches that we will recommend to DHHS Commissioner, Brenda Harvey. This process will be completed when the Commissioner reports back to the Legislature in January and we look at what actions we must take to institute recommended changes that improve cost-effective services for Mainers.

One of the other pieces of legislation I sponsored was LD 1089 which will bring Mixed Martial Arts events to Maine in a regulated manner. Over the summer, I have been working closely with the Governor’s Office identifying qualified people would be qualified to serve on that oversight authority. Those appointments should be made in the next few weeks. In addition, I have worked closely with the Attorney General’s Office on other aspects of implementing this legislation and will continue the effort to bring this sport to Maine, while insuring that it is operated to the highest standards.

Again, I want to express my appreciation to all the citizens of the River Valley for giving me this opportunity to serve. Since the session, I’ve spent the time traveling from home to work, heading into Augusta for meetings, and splitting my time between Rumford and our family camp on Roxbury Pond. I have enjoyed sharing with many of you during the various events in our area, and nothing is more important than the chance to talk with you, listen to your ideas and shape my opinions based on those conversations. Thank you for your input and please keep it coming. Contact me and I will do my best to respond as quickly as possible. I believe I can represent you best when the lines of communication are open.

State Revenue Falls Most Since 1963 on Incomes, Sales

By Jerry Hart and William Selway

Oct. 15 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. state tax collections tumbled the most in almost half a century in the second quarter as the economic recession curbed levies on incomes and sales.

The 16.6 percent plunge was the biggest since at least 1963, the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government said today. For the 12 months to June 30, the fiscal year for most states, revenue declined 8.2 percent, or $63 billion, about twice what states got from the $787 billion U.S. economic stimulus package, the institute said.

State revenue has dwindled for two straight quarters and continued to decline in July and August, the Albany-based research organization said. Budgets for the year that began July 1 already face $26 billion of deficits, the Washington, D.C.- based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said Aug. 12, forcing state lawmakers to confront additional spending cuts.

“We’re looking at a multiyear problem hitting essentially every state,” Robert Ward, the institute’s deputy director, told reporters. “It has happened during recessions before, but the depth of this decline is unprecedented in modern times.”

Collections dropped in 49 states in the second quarter as sales and personal-income taxes slid for the third consecutive period, the institute said. Income tax was down 27.5 percent and sales tax fell down 9.5 percent, its study said. Both categories fell by the most in 45 years.

“Many economists believe that the national recession has ended and that a tepid recovery is now underway,” Rockefeller analysts Lucy Dadayan and Donald J. Boyd wrote. “Unfortunately for states, an emerging economic recovery does not spell instant budget relief.”

‘Considerably More’

Figures for July and August for 36 early-reporting states showed tax collections down 8 percent, the Rockefeller Institute said. At least 17 states have announced budget shortfalls since July, with “considerably more” expected, Boyd said.

New York’s tax revenue from April 1 to Sept. 15 was $634.5 million below projections and $3.6 billion less than a year ago, Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said yesterday. California reported last week that revenue trailed a forecast made less than three months earlier by $1.1 billion, or 5.3 percent.

States are anticipating more cuts to current-year budgets, already pared once to bring them into balance. Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour told managers on Oct. 13 to cut spending 5 percent because tax collections in the first three months of fiscal 2010 were 7.7 percent below estimates. Florida Governor Charlie Crist told department heads on Oct. 12 not to request more money for next year, when the state faces a $2.6 billion deficit.

“It’s clear that when governors propose their budgets in January, the vast preponderance will be looking for more spending cuts and tax increases,” Boyd said.

Housing Market

The main driver for the second-quarter decline was lower income-tax collections, Boyd said on a conference call, “most likely due to lower capital gains from market declines in 2008 and the bursting real estate bubble.”

Payroll-tax withholding fell 4 percent from a year earlier and estimated-tax payments made in the quarter fell 32 percent in the median state, he said.

“Real wages take 13 to 17 quarters to recover from the end of a recession,” he said. “It will take several years for states to bring spending into line with incomes.”

The study’s retail-sales index showed an 11 percent decline since the start of the recession in December 2007, he said. The second quarter’s 9.5 percent decline in sales taxes followed an 8.3 percent decline in the first quarter, he said.

Alaska’s tax income declined the most of any state, the study said, with an 86.5 percent drop because of lower oil prices. Vermont fared the best, with a 2.2 percent gain because of a one-time estate-tax settlement.

Local tax collections declined by 2.8 percent in the second quarter, the Rockefeller study said. That’s less severe than the state slowdown because municipalities rely more on property taxes, which rose “a surprising” 3.1 percent in the quarter, the report said.

Still, 88 percent of local finance officers said in a September poll by the National League of Cities that they’re less able to cover expenses than in the year before.

To contact the reporters on this story: Jerry Hart in Miami at jhart@bloomberg.net; William Selway in San Francisco at wselway@bloomberg.net.

Original Link: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601015&sid=aeZod9l8IVx8

Local reps appointed to national legislative committees

AUGUSTA– Maine House Speaker Hannah Pingree recently appointed Reps. Matt Peterson, D-Rumford, and Sheryl Briggs, D-Mexico, to standing committees of the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

Peterson, who championed long-term care services throughout his first year as a state representative, was appointed to the Standing Committee on Health and the Standing Committee on Human Services and Welfare. He was additionally appointed to the state’s Long-term Care Oversight Committee.

“Our population is aging and as a result the need for long-term supportive services is increasing exponentially,” said Peterson. “This is a huge sector of spending in our Health and Human Services budget. We need to make it a top priority to constantly be finding ways to streamline the system to work better for consumers, the workers providing the services, and taxpayers.”

Briggs, who is a member of the State Legislature’s Inland, Fisheries and Wildlife Committee, was appointed to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Energy.

“I am honored and excited to have the opportunity to collaborate with other legislators from other states on these issues,” said Briggs. “Maine has a lot to bring to the table in terms of sustainable energy ideas, and I look forward to hearing what other states have tried.”

As members of their respective committees, legislators will have the opportunity to attend meetings and conferences hosted by NCSL.

Testimony In Support of LD 596

On March 10th, 2009, I testified in support of a bill I cosponsored. LD 596, "An Act to Allow Electricity Customers Who Operate Generating Faciltities To Be Paid in Cash for Excess Net Eneregy Produced," was submitted by Representative Jim Martin. The bill required transmission and distribution utility companies to compensate customers that generate electricity from renewable resources for any excess electricity generated by the customer beyond the customer's actual electricity usage. It required the compensation to be in the form of a cash payment or kilowatt-hour credits at the option of the customer. Unfortunately, the bill was reported out of the Utilities and Energy Committee "ought not to pass." Below is the testimony I offered in support of LD 596.

>
>

Senator Hobbins, Representative Hinck and members of the Joint Standing Committee on Utilities and Energy, I am Matt Peterson, proud to represent District 92 which includes the Oxford County towns of Andover, Byron, Roxbury, Rumford, Weld and plantations of Rangeley and Sandy River plus the unorganized territories of West Central Franklin and Madrid Township. I am here to speak in support of LD 596, "An Act to Allow Electricity Customers Who Operate Generating Facilities To Be Paid in Cash for Excess Net Energy Produced."

I am certain that I do not have to point out to any members of this committee, or this entire body, our need to encourage the production of renewable energy as a means of diminishing our dependence upon foreign energy sources as well as preserving and improving our environmental quality. I am pleased to represent an area that has the potential to emerge as a major energy provider -- given our hydro resources and potential, as well as proposed wind farms, possible bio-mass facilities, and an existing gas fired power generation facility. All of these are commercial energy producers -- but we must look for incentives for smaller operators and energy producers -- including home-owners and small businesses, to become a part of the state’s energy solutions.

This bill is a common sense and simple approach that builds upon the Maine tradition and policy of net-metering that was first enabled by this body more than twenty years ago. A next important step in encouraging the growth of small scale energy production and the use of the existing electric grid for cost effective energy storage, is to convert the value of that energy produced into cash for small generators. This bill will accomplish that goal and I urge the committee to give this legislation your positive consideration. While I am sure that there are many here with greater expertise in this matter, I would be happy to answer any questions regarding this proposal.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

LEAN Process as part of LD 1078 Commences

LEAN Philosophy: To create the most value [from the customer's perspective] while using the fewest resources.

LEAN Concepts and Principles:

• Know your customer--who they are and what they want
• Value is defined by the customer
• Keep the process simple
• Do "it" right the first time

As part of the passage of LD 1078 "An Act to Strengthen Sustainable Long-term Supportive Services for Maine Citizens," the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has convened a work group of persons representing all significant parties, including consumers, interested in the issue of efficient and effective long-term care (LTC) in Maine. The purpose of the work group is to analyze the LTC service system and make recommendations that will assist DHHS in designing a system that promotes consumer choice, transparency, portability and flexibility.

By January 15, 2010, the work group must report to the Legislature's Health & Human Services Committee. The report must contain the work group's recommendations for improvements in the long-term care system in the State. These recommendations must address:

• Intake & eligibility determination
• Consumer Assessment
• Development of plans of care
• The definition of qualified providers
• The means to standardize rates and wages within the system

On October 6th, 2009, the work group met for the second time. Tasks completed included a mapping of the current system, and identification and prioritization of consumer requirements of a long-term care in-home and community support service system.

Remarks for Joint Council Retreat 9.29.09

On Tuesday, September 29, 2009, I was asked to speak at the Joint Council Retreat of The State Rehab Council, The State Rehab Council for the Blind and Visually Impaired, The State Independent Living Council, The Commission for the Deaf, Hard of Hearing and Late-Deafened, and the Commission for Disability and Employment. Below is a copy of my remarks to the group:

It is a pleasure for me to be here with you this morning, and a real honor to have the chance to address this gathering of a number of bodies that work to set important aspects of our state’s policy with regard to people with a disability. I am Matt Peterson, and I represent District 92 which includes the Oxford County towns of Andover, Byron, Roxbury, and Rumford, as well as the Franklin County communities of Weld and plantations of Rangeley and Sandy River plus the unorganized territories of West Central Franklin and Madrid Township. I’ve gotten used to rattling that off -- because that is the way I introduce myself whenever I introduce myself at a legislative hearing -- whether I’m testifying or listening to testimony. I am in my first term as a part of Maine’s citizen Legislature, and I serve of the Joint Standing Committee on Health and Human Services. I am here today to offer some perspectives on advocacy for systems change -- and I can talk about it from two angles -- inside the system as a Legislator, as well as outside as an advocate.

Before I begin, I want to say that it is always good to share the rostrum with Commissioner Fortman from the Department of Labor. We may take it for granted, but Maine is very fortunate to have many of our disability programs and services delivered through the Department of Labor. In some states these programs are attached to the Department of Education. In some states, the programs are associated with the Health and Human Services Agency. In Maine, we make a strong statement by being one of only a handful of states that aligns disability services with the agency primarily responsible for employment and workplace issues. That speaks volumes about our philosophy regarding disability -- we emphasize productive employment and full integration in the community as the foundation for our disability policy.

That surely fits in with my personal philosophy. I was raised in Rumford, and never gave disability issues much of a thought until I was injured during my freshman year at the University of Maine. As a result, I’ve experienced aspects of the “disability system” from the inside. I was fortunate to get the chance to work at Alpha One, first on a part time basis on a particular project -- and finally getting the chance to move into a full time position as an Independent Living Specialist.

One of the opportunities that I got was to begin working on advocacy issues at the Legislature. The first time I went over to the State House as an advocate -- it was the second time I had been there. The first time was on my elementary school field trip. Fortunately, I was able to work with some people who knew their way around the state house and it wasn’t long before I felt I was making a contribution -- following the Legislative process, talking about policy with elected and appointed officials and advocating for people with a disability.

I can share the main lesson from that first year -- collaboration and coalition building is central to success. If you don’t take away anything else from my presentation today -- this is the key. Good advocacy -- and good public policy depends upon collaboration and coalition building.

We were successful in securing a wage increase for direct care workers -- the first in ten years -- by building a coalition that included the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), consumers who depend upon direct care workers to remain independent in their own homes, and direct care workers. I found out that the best advocates for the workers were the consumers they worked for; and among the best advocates for consumers were the direct care workers. SEIU has a motto -- Stronger Together -- and I think that fits.

Our efforts were successful and we made an important first step because we worked together -- and worked together effectively. Without that organization and collaboration we would not have succeeded.

Here’s what else I learned from that first year of advocacy work. To be successful you need:

• Clear goal or target
• Coherent strategy
• Consistent message
• Constant attention

With those “C’s” you stretch your chance to succeed in getting out your message, and getting the outcome you seek.

We had success in that session -- but we didn’t make as much progress as we had hoped for. As long as Commissioner Fortman doesn’t repeat this, I’ll tell you a secret. Getting legislation passed is the first step. You have to stay after the Executive Department -- the state agencies -- to implement the changes passed by the Legislature.

In short -- relationships make an enormous impact. Collaborative relationships with other individuals and organizations that share your goals are a starting point. Relationships with Legislators -- including those of the committee of jurisdiction (the Committee that hears your issue); legislative leaders in both parties, and be sure to include your own legislator!

Another year, I had a different experience -- this time working on the “defensive” and working to reverse a budget decision that had been proposed by the Administration and would have meant a significant loss of services for some consumers of home based care -- and could have resulted in unnecessary (and costly) institutionalization. I guess you can see what I mean by having a consistent and simple message. That was our message -- and the result was a restoration of that program to the budget.

By then, I had enough -- it was time to try to move to the other side of the table. I was fortunate to get lots of encouragement -- from the Representative who was term limited and forced to step down, from colleagues who had shared my advocacy work, from my employer who allowed me to work a more flexible schedule in order to run a campaign, and from wonderful friends, family and supporters who helped me mount and manage a successful campaign.

There were lots of times that the process seemed daunting. Sitting on the sidewalk, looking up a flight of stairs between me and the door I needed to knock on could have been intimidating. Fortunately, I knew what I had to do, so I always had good help with the door-to-door campaigning and I was able to visit every home in the district and ask for their vote. I was running against a former Representative who had served eight years before being term-limited. It was lots of hard work, but I was elected by a margin of more than 60% of the vote.

I was delighted by the victory -- and humbled by the responsibility. My fellow citizens in the Rumford area were putting their trust in me at a particularly difficult time. It made me even more determined to do a good job to represent my community and all the citizens of Maine.

I brought the lessons that I had learned as an advocate to my work as a Legislator. I wanted to stay focused -- develop a manageable portfolio of bills that would make a difference. I wanted to use every opportunity to build relationships -- and to listen and learn. I knew that I needed to stay well-connected to my community, as well as build new connections with colleagues in Augusta.

On these matters -- as with most of life -- I am a “work in progress.” It has been a wonderful learning experience to serve of the HHS Committee, but it has also been an enormous challenge to balance the many demands and programs against the diminishing resources. Talking to veteran legislators, I heard one thing over and over -- it is a lot more fun to be a legislator when there is money than when there is none.

The budget we passed in the last session is the first one in recent memory that is actually smaller than the one before it. Costs for services continue to rise -- and we have reduced the overall state budget. That means we made some difficult decisions, and I fear that many more lie ahead. Tomorrow the HHS Committee is meeting and we will be discussing the budget and budget prospects. Unfortunately, the direction we have been given from our leaders, and the instructions that the Governor has provided to his Departments is similar -- look for activities or whole programs that can be eliminated to generate budget savings.

The question in Augusta is -- “Where do we cut?” For those of us working to provide essential services for people with needs, that is a very harsh question because it really becomes -- “Who do we cut?”

While the cuts will be painful and the process will be difficult, it will also present opportunities. For example, I was able to introduce legislation in the last session -- LD 1078 -- a bill to promote changes in our long term care system to make it more responsive to the needs of people with a disability and seniors while using taxpayer dollars more efficiently. The issue is complex and there are lots of people with a stake in the outcome, some opposed and some in favor. Fortunately, I was able to work with both AARP and Alpha One in developing the bill and they were strong and constant advocates for its passage.

After a lot of hard work, we won the support and backing of the Department of Health and Human Services to begin this important work. As a result, the Health and Human Services Committee endorsed this bill unanimously and sent it on to the floor of the House and Senate where it passed unanimously before going to the Governor. This took a lot of work and patience -- because the Legislative process is “the art of compromise.” Based on the ambitious goals of this legislation, the work has just begun, with meetings that began over the summer, will continue in the fall, have a report back in January to the Legislature, and the beginnings of the new system put in place a year from July.

Another take away lesson here -- important things do not move quickly -- so practice patience every day.

If we are successful, this bill will encourage a rebalancing of Maine’s long term care system, placing a greater emphasis on cost-effective home and community based services, and less emphasis on more costly institutional alternatives. It should promote greater choice, more transparency and portability as well as easier access to appropriate services that promote independence for people with a disability and seniors. It is also making some people nervous -- particular those who have established their niche in the system and are doing very nicely, thank you, and would prefer not to change. But change is what we must expect -- particularly as we look to do more with less.

This is the essence of “bending the curve” which is at the heart of the LEAN process that is the tool we are using to promote this systems change. I look forward to the work and have high hopes for the outcomes.

As the work for the second year of the session gets underway, I’ll also be starting up my campaign again. Outreach, listening, and looking for opportunities to serve my constituents are at the top of my list. I don’t think I unique in any way when it comes to this. I believe that everyone in the Legislature is motivated by a desire to serve as best they can. They may have strong opinions and convictions, but I find almost all of my colleagues are primarily interested in getting good results for the citizens of Maine.

None of us can arrive at those good results without guidance from our fellow citizens. Phone calls, e-mails, notes, messages, every form of communication you can imagine is important to me -- and I take it seriously. Legislators want to hear from citizens -- and especially the voters in their district. Taking a minute to log a call or send an e-mail may be the thing that shapes a final outcome. This is where the constancy and patience comes into play. To be a good advocate, you have to communicate clearly -- and often. Get your message out, and build a coalition of voters to help you develop it. I can assure you that having AARP with its 200,000+ members in Maine, busloads of them in red shirts who showed up to the public hearing, got the discussion off to a great start.

Citizens have power and can make a difference. So, I encourage you to think about the important issues, develop your ideas and approaches, build coalitions with like-minded associates, and promote those ideas at the state house. Almost everyone in this room could run for office. If you are willing to put in the work of knocking on doors, meeting and listening -- you can get elected. If that sounds like too much work -- you can still play a very big part. Make yourself heard. Build coalitions that can deliver the message.

Attitude is a key -- it’s easy to complain about things, and much harder to come up with solutions. As an advocate -- be part of the coalition working on a solution. The people who have ideas and are willing to think about problems and issues in new ways are often the people who have the most influence in Augusta. Look for creative solutions -- get involved as a problem solver.

It will be another tough budget year in Augusta. We will be forced to make more hard choices. I’m not looking forward to it, but it may create opportunities for us to do things in new ways that will meet the needs using the resources we have.

In the final analysis -- all of us together are smarter than any one or two of us. The opportunity to work for change -- and for making things better -- always exists. I urge you to find your best way to get involved and be a part of that change. You can do it -- you can make a difference. If I didn’t believe that, I wouldn’t be doing any of this.

Thanks for your time and attention. If we have time, I’d be glad to answer questions.

Rep. Peterson recognized for conservation and environmental work

RUMFORD - Local State Rep. Matt Peterson was recognized recently by the Maine League of Conservation Voters for his work to improve conservation and environmental protection laws during the 2009 legislative session. Peterson earned a perfect 7-for-7 score on the MLCV's Environmental Scorecard.

The League, which rates all 186 state House and Senate lawmakers on their voting record for conservation issues, issues an annual legislative scorecard based on votes taken on specific and critical bills that have an impact on the state's natural resources.

This year's scorecard included positive votes on bills to increase clean water protections for a number of waterways in Maine; provide for safe collection of mercury-containing light bulbs; ensure that replacement culverts permit fish passage; and establish an Efficiency Trust to increase household and business weatherization, with a goal of weatherizing every home and business in the state by 2030.

Legislators also earned positive scores for voting against a bill that would have given power to a small group of private businesses to overhaul the state's regulatory system, and a bill that would have eliminated LURC in favor of county management of Maine's unorganized territories.

The Maine League of Conservation Voters has tracked and reported legislators' voting records on key environmental issues since 1986. To view the entire scorecard, with bill summaries and a full list of honor roll and dishonor roll members for 2009, visit http://www.mlcv.org/ and click on "2009 Maine House and Senate Scorecards" on the right-side column.